Compartment Venting Analysis

Enclosure Venting and Pressure Equalization

As a launch vehicle ascends, air contained within compartments and bays must be vented overboard to a decreasing atmospheric pressure. At front-facing openings, the increasing vehicle speed means hotter air entering the compartments at those points.

Sometimes the design concern is to provide adequate (but not excessive) pressure equalization paths, and sometimes the concern is to keep avionics from getting too hot or too cold (for example, below the dew point). Such thermal design concerns can be complicated by expansion cooling and compression heating of air, which can include a strong dependency on adjacent compartments. For example, compression heating of a compartment can be exaggerated when the air entering that compartment is itself being warmed by compression of an upstream compartment.

Other times the goal is simply to calculate the pressures in the bays particularly if there are multiple holes around the vehicle that air can escape or enter.  If the vehicle is at a high Mach number, the external pressure can vary significantly from front to back and top to bottom.  This can cause the differential pressure across the external to be quite large which is a particular concern if there are doors, hatches, or other moveable components that have to seal.   
 
Another purpose in such analyses could be to satisfy a general ventilation requirement (for example, 10 air changes per minute in each compartment) so that any gas (such as leaking fuel vapor) will be exhausted quickly.

Similar problems face scientific balloons, aircraft bays and cabins, instrument pods, and other flight vehicles.

An intentionally generic example problem of bay venting and refilling has been developed to illustrate key modeling concepts. This example covers a vehicle that ascends from sea level to 40,000 feet and then returns, simultaneously accelerating from Mach=0.1 to 1.4 and decelerating again to Mach=0.1 as it lands. The entire flight takes 6 minutes (tf = 0.1 hours).

Four bays are arranged as follows (the openings are flush and sharp-edged, whereas in the drawing they are exaggerated in order to make them more visible):

A sketch-pad style FloCAD® model is built. When limits on positive and negative (vacuum) pressure differential and caps on internal temperatures are imposed, the initial design fails to meet the requirements. Bay 3 overheated, and the pressures were too high (relative to the external static pressure on the sides of the vehicle) in several bays.

The SINDA/FLUINT Solver (an optimization and tasking module) is then set up to find new sizes for the intercompartmental openings, inlet, and exhausts (6 design variables in total) that will meet the design requirements (3 constraints) for the flight profile while minimizing the inlet size (the opening at the leading edge to Bay #1). The design that was found decreased total flow, but increased flow through Bays 1 through 3 while reducing flow to Bay 4:

   Inlet to Bay 1:       0.316 in2 (minimized)     (was 1.7 in2)
   Bay 1 to 2:           3.16 in2                  (was 0.6 in2)
   Bay 2 to 3:           1.35 in2                  (was 0.2 in2)
   Bay 3 exhaust:        0.646 in2                 (was 0.1 in2)
   Bay 2 to 4:           0.0223 in2                (was 0.1 in2)
   Bay 4 exhaust:        0.0586 in2                (was 0.02 in2)

Click here to fetch the Compartment Venting Example from our User Forum

Advanced Pipes in FloCAD
Thursday November 14, 9-10am MT (8-9am PT, 11am-noon ET)
This webinar introduces advanced features for FloCAD pipes in addition to working with complex geometry. Complex geometry includes interior fins and surfaces for heat transfer, flow around enclosed objects, annular flow, concentric pipes, and more. FK Locators and TEEs as modeling objects will also be introduced.
Custom Heat Transfer and Pressure Drops
Tuesday November 19, 2-3pm MT (1-2pm PT, 4-5pm ET)
Do you know what the default assumptions are in FloCAD, and whether or not they apply in your situation? Do you know how far you can go past that starting point? The answer: pretty far. There are numerous mechanisms in FloCAD for adjusting factors, scaling uncertainties, and applying different or supplemental correlations. This webinar summarizes the options available to you to customize your flow models to make sure that they apply to each new situation you encounter.
Heat Exchangers: Detailed and System-level
Thursday November 21, 2-3pm MT (1-2pm PT, 4-5pm ET)
This is two webinars in one. The first explains the use and assumptions behind the FloCAD HX system-level modeling object. The second webinar describes detailed-level modeling of complex heat exchanger passages, including application of Compact Heat Exchanger (CHX) methods.
Starting in 2020, we will begin offering Introduction to Thermal Desktop and Introduction to RadCAD as either in-person training or online training, alternating between online and in-person every three months. The training uses lectures and demonstrations to introduce you to basic Thermal Desktop and RadCAD usage. Hands-on tutorials provide practice building models and interpreting results (tutorials are completed by students outside of the online class time).
 
The next training class will be an online format in January 2020:
  • Introduction to Thermal Desktop (and SINDA) - A three-part series on January 14, 16, and 21 from 9am to 12pm, Mountain time
  • Introduction to RadCAD - January 23 from 9am to 12pm, Mountain time
For up-to-date schedules, fees, and policies, visit our Product Training page. To register for the class above, complete our registration form and select "Online" for the Training Format.
 
If you are interested in product training for your company based on your schedule, please contact us to obtain a quote for training between 8-12 attendees. We can come to your facility or the lectures can be presented online. Descriptions of the available classes can be found in our course catalog.
 
To keep up with our training opportunities, take a look at our new Events and Training Calendar.