Line Chilldown

Line Chilldown Using Liquid Hydrogen and Liquid Nitrogen

This validation case compares SINDA/FLUINT and FloCAD® predictions with a 1966 test by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS, now National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST). In the NBS tests, a pressurized dewar containing either LN2 or LH2 was isolated from an empty 200ft (61m) line (open to the atmosphere) by a valve. At time zero, the valve between the dewar and the line was opened, and cryogenic liquid was allowed to flow until the line was completely full and liquid was discharged from open end of the pipe.

Test Set-up

Comparison with Test Data

Liquid (Normal) Hydrogen, Comparison with Figure 7

Differences between parahydrogen and normal hydrogen are explored, since the exact composition of the hydrogen is unknown. The importance of uncertainties in heat transfer and pressure drop correlations, copper alloy properties (also unknown), dewar pressure, and even the roughness and manufacturing tolerance of the tubing is explored. This study demonstrates automated calibration to test data, and investigation of sensitivities.

Click here to fetch the Cryogenic Cooldown Validation from our User Forum

Download the full Line Chilldown Validation report

See also LNG chilldown of a flexible composite hose

Recent News

Webinar: Curved Elements Just for Thermal Engineers

Flat finite elements require a lot of tiny facets to wrap around curved shapes without losing mass or surface area, even when the temperature gradients aren't large enough to justify all those elements.

Read More
Anode and cathode of a flow battery

Webinar: Managing the Sinaps to TD/FloCAD Transition

Using Sinaps? It is not too soon to get started with TD/FloCAD!

Read More

"Tips and Tricks" Webinar: Network Element Logic

Thermal Desktop (TD) is fully parametric: any input can be specified as a function of almost anything, including outputs. TD also accepts arbitrarily complex co-solved customizations.

Read More